8/29/2007

Anyone Seeing A Pattern?...

I don't know about you, but from now on, anytime I hear a republican stridently condemning "immoral" behavior or heaping judgment on someone else, I'm gonna assume they are either:

paying for sex,

having homosexual sex,

paying for homosexual sex,

or having homosexual sex with children.

Wouldn't it be awesome if all these "moral crusaders" had to start toning their rhetoric down out of fear that they might become suspect of similar behavior. A few more of these cases and it might actually happen.

For the record, as you all know, there is NOTHING wrong with people having homosexual consensual sex. There IS something wrong with being a big ol' hypocrite.

11 comments:

vikkitikkitavi said...

I had no idea you were prejudiced against homosexual NON-CONSENSUAL sex. Now, according to your own prediction, I must suspect that that's exactly the kind of sex you must be having.

Chris said...

Vikki- Touché.

Chris said...

Come to think of it, all we need now is a rapist (although I guess Foley is a statutory rapist), a necrophiliac, and someone who's into bestiality and we'll be set. What else am I forgetting?

cooper green said...

Are we talking consensual rape here? Because that makes a big difference.

Skylers Dad said...

I'm waiting for a "petting zoo" incident!

Frank Sirmarco said...

I want someone to be caught blowing the San Diego Chicken - in his chicken outfit.

I think that would be wonderful.

Laaw-yuhr said...

WORD.

Grant Miller said...

When was that picture of Foley taken? He's in front of a "Log Cabin Republican" sign.

Micgar said...

All those guys really suck!

The Idea Of Progress said...

Hear hear!

Madam Z said...

How about paying for homosexual consensual sex with children while at the zoo?