or having homosexual sex with children.
Wouldn't it be awesome if all these "moral crusaders" had to start toning their rhetoric down out of fear that they might become suspect of similar behavior. A few more of these cases and it might actually happen.
For the record, as you all know, there is NOTHING wrong with people having homosexual consensual sex. There IS something wrong with being a big ol' hypocrite.
Wouldn't it be awesome if all these "moral crusaders" had to start toning their rhetoric down out of fear that they might become suspect of similar behavior. A few more of these cases and it might actually happen.
For the record, as you all know, there is NOTHING wrong with people having homosexual consensual sex. There IS something wrong with being a big ol' hypocrite.
10 comments:
I had no idea you were prejudiced against homosexual NON-CONSENSUAL sex. Now, according to your own prediction, I must suspect that that's exactly the kind of sex you must be having.
Vikki- Touché.
Come to think of it, all we need now is a rapist (although I guess Foley is a statutory rapist), a necrophiliac, and someone who's into bestiality and we'll be set. What else am I forgetting?
Are we talking consensual rape here? Because that makes a big difference.
I'm waiting for a "petting zoo" incident!
I want someone to be caught blowing the San Diego Chicken - in his chicken outfit.
I think that would be wonderful.
WORD.
When was that picture of Foley taken? He's in front of a "Log Cabin Republican" sign.
All those guys really suck!
Hear hear!
Post a Comment