O'Reilly really seems to have a hard-on for George Soros. He can't stop talking about him. I have heard him on many occassions state that no one cares what Soros says, and then continues to devote segment after segment on him and the things he's said. The latest bug in O'Reilly's ass has to do with THIS article Soros wrote for the Wall Street Journal. O'Reilly didn't like it - surprise surprise! Media Matters has his response from his radio show HERE.
I happen to agree with a lot of what Soros says (surprise surprise). One thing that struck me is O'Reilly's shock at the fact that Soros says the "War On Terror" can't be won. Well, gentle reader, here's the thing - it can't. I've said this before. Ask yourself what conditions would be necessary to declare victory in the "War On Terror". I mean to WIN, not to BE WINNING. The only thing I can come up with is that every terrorist will either need to be captured or killed. Impossible. Just for the sake of argument, let's say we did just that - every known terrorist was killed or locked up. Then, the next day, someone blows themselves up in a market somewhere. Is the war back on? No. There is no war. Well, wait a second. If you like the prospect of perpetual war, then I suppose this is right up your alley.
Yet more evidence that O'Reilly is, in fact, a cunt-ass peehole.